2013/4/10 Justin Ruggles <[email protected]>: > On 04/09/2013 06:57 PM, Christophe Gisquet wrote: >> + mova m2, [zq] > > why mova instead of movq?
Remnant of SSE code, removed. >> + movq [r2q], m2 >> + REP_RET I noticed I was using an extra register for nothing, so here's an updated patch for this. -- Christophe
0001-x86-sbrdsp-implement-SSE2-qmf_pre_shuffle.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
