On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 18:09:17 +0200, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > --- > tests/fate/filter-video.mak | 23 +++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/fate/filter-video.mak b/tests/fate/filter-video.mak > index 45d0cf1..34d8e9b 100644 > --- a/tests/fate/filter-video.mak > +++ b/tests/fate/filter-video.mak > @@ -1,9 +1,19 @@ > +FATE_YADIF += fate-filter-yadif-mode0 > +fate-filter-yadif-mode0: CMD = framecrc -flags bitexact -idct simple -i > $(SAMPLES)/mpeg2/mpeg2_field_encoding.ts -vf yadif=0 > + > +FATE_YADIF += fate-filter-yadif-mode1 > +fate-filter-yadif-mode1: CMD = framecrc -flags bitexact -idct simple -i > $(SAMPLES)/mpeg2/mpeg2_field_encoding.ts -vf yadif=1 > + > +FATE_FILTER-$(call FILTERDEMDEC, YADIF, MPEGTS, MPEG2VIDEO) += $(FATE_YADIF) > + > +FATE_SAMPLES_AVCONV += $(FATE_FILTER-yes) > +
How is putting yadif on top more sensible? -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
