On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:09:49 +0200, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 06:33:16PM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 18:09:17 +0200, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > --- a/tests/fate/filter-video.mak
> > > +++ b/tests/fate/filter-video.mak
> > > @@ -1,9 +1,19 @@
> > > +FATE_YADIF += fate-filter-yadif-mode0
> > > +fate-filter-yadif-mode0: CMD = framecrc -flags bitexact -idct simple -i 
> > > $(SAMPLES)/mpeg2/mpeg2_field_encoding.ts -vf yadif=0
> > > +
> > > +FATE_YADIF += fate-filter-yadif-mode1
> > > +fate-filter-yadif-mode1: CMD = framecrc -flags bitexact -idct simple -i 
> > > $(SAMPLES)/mpeg2/mpeg2_field_encoding.ts -vf yadif=1
> > > +
> > > +FATE_FILTER-$(call FILTERDEMDEC, YADIF, MPEGTS, MPEG2VIDEO) += 
> > > $(FATE_YADIF)
> > > +
> > > +FATE_SAMPLES_AVCONV += $(FATE_FILTER-yes)
> > 
> > How is putting yadif on top more sensible?
> 
> It separates the vsynth tests from the others.
> 

Then why isn't delogo on top?

-- 
Anton Khirnov
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to