On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 21:23:26 +0200, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 09:10:02PM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > ---
> >  Changelog                            |    1 +
> >  doc/filters.texi                     |  125 +++++++++++
> >  libavfilter/Makefile                 |    2 +
> >  libavfilter/allfilters.c             |    2 +
> >  libavfilter/trim.c                   |  407 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  tests/fate/filter.mak                |   30 +++
> >  tests/ref/fate/filter-atrim-duration |    2 +
> >  tests/ref/fate/filter-atrim-mixed    |    5 +
> >  tests/ref/fate/filter-atrim-samples  |    2 +
> >  tests/ref/fate/filter-atrim-time     |    6 +
> >  tests/ref/fate/filter-trim-duration  |    2 +
> >  tests/ref/fate/filter-trim-frame     |    8 +
> >  tests/ref/fate/filter-trim-mixed     |   10 +
> >  tests/ref/fate/filter-trim-time      |    3 +
> >  14 files changed, 605 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 libavfilter/trim.c
> >  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-atrim-duration
> >  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-atrim-mixed
> >  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-atrim-samples
> >  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-atrim-time
> >  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-trim-duration
> >  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-trim-frame
> >  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-trim-mixed
> >  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-trim-time
> 
> version bump missing
> 

It's bumped in a previous commit which adds the asetpts filter.

Since they will be pushed in one batch, I don't see a need to bump the version
twice.

> > --- a/doc/filters.texi
> > +++ b/doc/filters.texi
> > @@ -345,6 +345,70 @@ with a negative pts due to encoder delay.
> > +
> > +Note that that the first two sets of the start/end options and the
> > +@option{duration} option look at the frame timestamp, while the _sample 
> > options
> > +simply count the samples that pass through the filter. So start/end_pts and
> > +start/end_sample will give different results when the timestamps are wrong,
> 
> One could optionally add some markup around all the _sample mentions.
> 

I'm not very proficient with texinfo markup, so I'll leave that to other
volunteers.

The rest fixed.

-- 
Anton Khirnov
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to