On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:39:07 +0200, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/30/2013 10:49 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > I don't think it's better. > > > > If the caller bothered to set this option, the he probably cares about it > > being > > used. So IMO it's better to fail if we cannot do what was requested. > > > > Also at this point we have probably irretrievably overwritten some other > > data. > > This could be handled of course, but I really think it's better to fail. > > I do not have a strong opinion on that. worst case we'll get a feature > request later. Just make sure in the option description it is stated > clearly. Having your encoding fail badly after 4 hours and 1 minute > because you didn't consider the minute would be quite bad. (considering > you would be able to fix the issue by streamcopying once the problem is > reported) >
The docs say it clearly enough i think. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
