On 2013-05-20 10:18:52 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 05/20/2013 09:50 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
... > > I also toyed with the idea to make this the default, but that'd easily > > lead to people forgetting to set the variable to make sure fate tests > > they add are properly set up. if it's made default it should be a warning instead of error. Even if it's not default a warning on a missing config is probably a good idea. > The best would be making so make config is the only thing triggering > it... Maybe is feasible. I don't see how. Moving the CHKCFG calls to secondary expansion would require a rewrite of the fate make rules (if it at all is possible). A recursive make for fate% to avoid including tests/Makefile in the main Makefile doesn't let us use finegrained prerequisites for fate targets. Janne _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
