On 06/23/2013 10:44 PM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > Its called jpeg2000 today, what good would renaming it ever do? > How is jpeg2k more readable? Personally i think it looks ugly, because > the official name is jpeg2000.
the jpeg2000 -> jpeg2k (and variants) reduces the vertical dimension, so does moving from compno to i when you are iterating. It helps me greatly since I'm juggling way too many patches, once I'm done I can probably undo some if not all those changes if you all really dislike them. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
