On 28/08/13 10:00, Diego Biurrun wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:47:35AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: >> On 28/08/13 00:12, Diego Biurrun wrote: >>> The i686 feature really is a CPU feature and should be handled as such. >>> The cpunop dependency on i686 should be expressed with a standard _deps >>> declaration instead of a manual test. >> >> What i686 does exactly? > > It's supposed to cover the changes from the i586 to i686 x86 architecture, > which covers cmov, long nops, and probably more that I forget.
x86 != x86_64 I wouldn't mix those. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
