On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:24:37AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 28/08/13 10:00, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:47:35AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: > >> On 28/08/13 00:12, Diego Biurrun wrote: > >>> The i686 feature really is a CPU feature and should be handled as such. > >>> The cpunop dependency on i686 should be expressed with a standard _deps > >>> declaration instead of a manual test. > >> > >> What i686 does exactly? > > > > It's supposed to cover the changes from the i586 to i686 x86 architecture, > > which covers cmov, long nops, and probably more that I forget. > > x86 != x86_64 > > I wouldn't mix those.
Yes, sure, but what's your point here? That x86_64 does not imply i686? I doubt there will ever be an x86_64 CPU w/o cmov and friends; it would not be backwards-compatible.. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
