On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Vittorio Giovara <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Hendrik Leppkes <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Vittorio Giovara <[email protected] >>> wrote: >> >>> --- >>> I performed some more benchmarking and the results at higher bitrates show >>> that the current implementation is better (by a tiny amount anyway). So I >>> rebased and reimplemented my change just as code simplification, without >>> modifying the inline attribute of the internal function. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Vittorio >>> >>> libavcodec/mpeg12enc.c | 9 +++------ >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>>
I misunderstood how the code worked here and the benefits of inlining against codesize. Sorry for the noise and thanks for the explanation on IRC. Patch dropped. Vittorio _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
