On Saturday 14 December 2013 18:43:31 Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> This is ok, but it looks more like a "finish implementation" than
> "refactor", maybe the commit title could reflect that.
> Vittorio
I called it a refactoring because it mostly moves things around (except for a 
few elements like general_progressive_source_flag which were ignored before and 
are now stored in PTLCommon).
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to