On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Guillaume Martres <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Saturday 14 December 2013 18:43:31 Vittorio Giovara wrote:
>> This is ok, but it looks more like a "finish implementation" than
>> "refactor", maybe the commit title could reflect that.
>> Vittorio
> I called it a refactoring because it mostly moves things around (except for a
> few elements like general_progressive_source_flag which were ignored before 
> and
> are now stored in PTLCommon).

Fine, but it'd be nice if you could add a brief comment in the commit
log about that.
Vittorio
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to