On 12/15/2013 1:32 AM, Mason Carter wrote: > I did not have the resources to run FATE, but I used my own test harness > comparing the results of the NEON functions to the C functions and I also > used framemd5 on some VC1 files that I had. The result was that I made the > inv_trans code resilient to a little bit of overflow, while still doing > 16-bit math. Why the overflow? Probably just out of spec files produced by > old, buggy encoders.
FWIW, I tested and FATE passes fine with these. - Derek _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
