On 16/12/13 09:28, Martin Storsjö wrote: > On Sun, 15 Dec 2013, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > >> On 12/15/2013 1:32 AM, Mason Carter wrote: >>> I did not have the resources to run FATE, but I used my own test harness >>> comparing the results of the NEON functions to the C functions and I >>> also >>> used framemd5 on some VC1 files that I had. The result was that I >>> made the >>> inv_trans code resilient to a little bit of overflow, while still doing >>> 16-bit math. Why the overflow? Probably just out of spec files >>> produced by >>> old, buggy encoders. >> >> FWIW, I tested and FATE passes fine with these. > > Ditto, and it also seems to work fine with gas-preprocessor. >
Willing to push them? lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
