On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:10:40 +0100, Anton Khirnov <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:42:10 +0100, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 21/01/14 19:28, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > > Libavdevice is not really a standalone library, it depends (by > > > definition) on libavformat internal symbols. As there are no real reason > > > for it to be a separate library, the best solution for the associated ABI > > > problems is to merge it with libavformat. > > > > Beside Derek articulated explanation on why it is a bad idea looks like > > that there isn't support for this. > > After a discussion on IRC: > Hendrik, J-B, wm4 and others don't mind this in principle, as long as > --disable-devices still works. > I failed to get any arguments from Kieran. >
For the record, Kieran joined the people who don't oppose this if --disable-devices continues working. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
