On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:54:28 -0500, Reinhard Tartler <[email protected]> wrote: > The only reason I have implemented this pattern is because of licensing > reasons: gplv2 only applications must not be linked against gplv3 only > libraries. > > I am not willing to introduce more libraries to avoid dependencies. The > current situation is already bad enough. > > As for the merge itself, I am not strictly opposed to the idea, but I'm not > sure if this is something for libav10. The merge will require build system > changes for applications that currently use libavdevice, and we already > have more than enough breakage.
That is fine, I do not intend for this to go in the release. It's still just a RFC. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
