On 08/02/14 18:35, Guillaume Martres wrote: > Looks OK, but it seems like it'd be simpler to do the check directly in > mv_scale (and maybe also print an error since this should not happen in a > valid bitstream).
In check_mvset the concealment happens before, could you have a look and tell me if the two functions are to merge together? lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
