On Sunday 09 February 2014 11:09:27 Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 08/02/14 18:35, Guillaume Martres wrote:
> > Looks OK, but it seems like it'd be simpler to do the check directly in
> > mv_scale (and maybe also print an error since this should not happen in a
> > valid bitstream).
>
> In check_mvset the concealment happens before, could you have a look and
> tell me if the two functions are to merge together?
>
> lu
I guess leaving it the way it is now is OK.
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
