On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 19/07/14 22:11, Andrew Kelley wrote:
> > What about these mime types?
> >
> > audio/3gpp, audio/3gpp2,
>
> Those do not map to other codecs as well?
>
> audio/MP4A-LATM, audio/mpeg4-generic
>
>
> those might refer to another container format, am I wrong?
>
>
> audio/mp4 is containerless as well?
>

I think you are right, the mime types are correct as is. I was not sure how
the resolution works, if it is possible for multiple codecs to register the
same mime type or not. It seems that it makes sense if multiple codecs
could register for the same mime type - it would still reduce ambiguity
when resolving the format/codec of a stream.
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to