On 19/07/14 22:25, Andrew Kelley wrote: > On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 19/07/14 22:11, Andrew Kelley wrote: >>> What about these mime types? >>> >>> audio/3gpp, audio/3gpp2, >> >> Those do not map to other codecs as well? >> >> audio/MP4A-LATM, audio/mpeg4-generic >> >> >> those might refer to another container format, am I wrong? >> >> >> audio/mp4 is containerless as well? >> > > I think you are right, the mime types are correct as is. I was not sure how > the resolution works, if it is possible for multiple codecs to register the > same mime type or not. It seems that it makes sense if multiple codecs > could register for the same mime type - it would still reduce ambiguity > when resolving the format/codec of a stream.
Surely we should register those to the appropriate demuxers and I'd welcome patches in that direction =) lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
