On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 20:24:20 -0400 Andrew Stone <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> A flag to indicate that a flag has been set? That seems like a bit too > >> much. I would honestly rather iterate the streams. > > > > +1 > > meta-meta-flags are really rather overkill. > > > > As for a single event flag vs per-stream event flags, i slightly prefer the > > latter, but can live with either. So the patch is fine with me as is. > > I prefer them all in one place. wm4, how strongly do you feel about > flag-per-stream? Unfortunately, I'd still prefer per-stream flags. They are IMHO somewhat important to conveniently tell _if_ the metadata of a specific stream changed. (If that were not an issue, we wouldn't need these flags at all, would we?) So I guess, give the streams separate flags, and don't add a meta-meta flag, and require the user to iterate over all streams on each packet read. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
