On Sat, 9 Aug 2014 21:22:13 +0300 (EEST)
Martin Storsjö <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, 31 Jul 2014, Andrew Stone wrote:
> 
> > It won't hurt servers that don't care about the header,
> > and those that do will include it by default.
> > ---
> > Changelog          | 1 +
> > doc/protocols.texi | 2 +-
> > libavformat/http.c | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> I'm slightly sceptical about this one. Yes, technically, this shouldn't 
> affect any server that doesn't care about it, but in practice the world is 
> riddled with more or less broken stuff. OTOH I don't really think any 
> commonly used servers will break if we start requesting this, but I mainly 
> think it might look a little odd to add this in all requests when it's 
> only relevant in a small fraction of all uses cases.
> 
> But all in all I guess it's ok, and in case there's reports of issues with 
> it, we can always revert it.

For what's it worth, I haven't encountered a server yet where sending
this header broke something.
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to