On 26/08/14 16:50, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > Indeed, xcb-shm is only needed for MIT-SHM support (and makes no sense > on platforms without SysV SHM).
Good point to keep it optional. > But xcb-xfixes is also optional, only > needed for pointer capture. However, given they all come from the same > source package (xcb), and are just wrappers around the base run-time > library (libxcb), splitting may be overkill. I could make it optional as well but it might be a little overkill right... lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
