Hallo,
Am 17.09.2014 14:27, schrieb Vittorio Giovara:
> RTPDynamicProtocolHandler ff_hevc_dynamic_handler = {
> - .enc_name = "HEVC",
> - .codec_type = AVMEDIA_TYPE_VIDEO,
> - .codec_id = AV_CODEC_ID_HEVC,
> - .init = hevc_init,
> - .parse_sdp_a_line = hevc_parse_sdp_line,
> - .alloc = hevc_new_context,
> - .free = hevc_free_context,
> - .parse_packet = hevc_handle_packet
> -};
> -
> -RTPDynamicProtocolHandler ff_h265_dynamic_handler = {
> .enc_name = "H265",
> .codec_type = AVMEDIA_TYPE_VIDEO,
> .codec_id = AV_CODEC_ID_HEVC,
Okay, it seems that this entry is a duplicated one. But the idea was to
remain compatible to a possible "HEVC" description.
So, if some other software signals "HEVC" inside SDP as indicator for
H.265, the "duplicated entry" is needed.
I would suggest to leave this duplicated entry in the code.
Best regards,
Thomas.
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
