On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Thomas Volkert <[email protected]> wrote: > Hallo, > > Am 17.09.2014 14:27, schrieb Vittorio Giovara: >> RTPDynamicProtocolHandler ff_hevc_dynamic_handler = { >> - .enc_name = "HEVC", >> - .codec_type = AVMEDIA_TYPE_VIDEO, >> - .codec_id = AV_CODEC_ID_HEVC, >> - .init = hevc_init, >> - .parse_sdp_a_line = hevc_parse_sdp_line, >> - .alloc = hevc_new_context, >> - .free = hevc_free_context, >> - .parse_packet = hevc_handle_packet >> -}; >> - >> -RTPDynamicProtocolHandler ff_h265_dynamic_handler = { >> .enc_name = "H265", >> .codec_type = AVMEDIA_TYPE_VIDEO, >> .codec_id = AV_CODEC_ID_HEVC, > > Okay, it seems that this entry is a duplicated one. But the idea was to > remain compatible to a possible "HEVC" description. > So, if some other software signals "HEVC" inside SDP as indicator for > H.265, the "duplicated entry" is needed. > I would suggest to leave this duplicated entry in the code.
Hm, okay, would you mind just adding a comment in the code so that we do not forget in the future? Thanks. -- Vittorio _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
