Quoting Luca Barbato (2014-10-17 13:53:48)
> On 17/10/14 13:49, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > Quoting Vittorio Giovara (2014-10-15 18:32:56)
> >> From: Luca Barbato <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> Spare a branch and make coverity less confused.
> >>
> >> CC: [email protected]
> >> Bug-Id: CID 732222
> >> ---
> >>   libavresample/utils.c | 9 ++++-----
> >>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >
> > Yet again -- I'm not a fan of randomly shuffling code around just to
> > make some specific tool shut up. There is a huge number of such tools
> > and each one complains about different perfectly valid code. We cannot
> > appease them all and we should not try.
> >
> 
> Makes the code simpler first of all, the fact it makes coverity happier 
> is just icing on the cake.
> 
> (If coverity is less confused the compiler as well is less confused thus 
> usually generating better code)
> 

Well, I do not think it is simpler or better in any way.

And any performance gains you could possibly gain here are completely
irrelevant.

-- 
Anton Khirnov
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to