On 2015-02-22 00:16:07 +0200, Martin Storsjö wrote: > On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Janne Grunau wrote: > > >On 2015-02-18 00:44:14 +0200, Martin Storsjö wrote: > >>When all the codepaths using manually set .arch/.fpu code is > >>behind runtime detection, the elf attributes should be suppressed. > > > >Are you sure everything is behind runtime detection? It probably is > >since everything without runtime detection is probably in inline asm so > >it can be inlined. > > It should be - I hope. If the compiler is free to output such > instructions unconditionally, compiler generated files will have > such tags set anyway.
Yes, that was my complicated way of saying that there should be no function without runtime detection in .S > >>+ELF .object_arch armv4 > > > >is .object_arch understood by all assemblers? Main one to worry about is > >probably llvm's integrated assembler. Do we use/support something else > >for elf targets? > > Haven't tested LLVM's integrated assembler - can you test it? I'll do tomorrow. In the worst case we have to add it to gaspp since it still can't assemble other bits. Janne _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
