On 09/05/15 21:53, Timothy Gu wrote: > On May 9, 2015 6:52 AM, "Luca Barbato" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Reduce greatly the time to test, the coverage remains unchanged. > > I like this idea, but for some filters that require multiple frames to emit > useful output this might disrupt their output. How about using a small > number of frames, like 3?
The pixel format tests work on a single image that I know. Probably reducing the video-filter test to use just 5 frames would get some additional gain. > Also excuse me for not testing myself, but how much time is reduced after > this patch? For fate -j 1 real 1m52.105s user 1m42.616s sys 0m6.320s vs real 1m14.276s user 1m7.204s sys 0m4.076s My use-case requires running every test 30+ times, so it is quite compelling to me. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
