On 09/05/15 22:47, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 09/05/15 21:53, Timothy Gu wrote: >> On May 9, 2015 6:52 AM, "Luca Barbato" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Reduce greatly the time to test, the coverage remains unchanged. >> >> I like this idea, but for some filters that require multiple frames to emit >> useful output this might disrupt their output. How about using a small >> number of frames, like 3? > > The pixel format tests work on a single image that I know. Probably > reducing the video-filter test to use just 5 frames would get some > additional gain. > >> Also excuse me for not testing myself, but how much time is reduced after >> this patch? > > For fate -j 1 > > real 1m52.105s > user 1m42.616s > sys 0m6.320s > > vs > > real 1m14.276s > user 1m7.204s > sys 0m4.076s > > My use-case requires running every test 30+ times, so it is quite > compelling to me. >
Your suggestion works even better! real 1m6.443s user 0m59.464s sys 0m3.916s All combined real 1m3.547s user 0m56.484s sys 0m4.024s lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
