On 31/05/15 17:01, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 27/05/15 22:25, James Almer wrote: >> Yes, that plus a considerable amount of ifdeffery in the code. It >> will be ugly, but i also think it's worth keeping compatibility with >> at least 1.3.0 >> > > 1.3.0 explodes on 422p that at least in theory should support. (I'm > testing all the possible encodings right now). >
1.3.0 seems that had been released when not ready, do we really want to support it? lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
