On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 17/07/15 15:18, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On 17/07/15 01:44, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Add DCI 4k and 2160p.
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I'm testing which encoders are able to do something with 4k now =)
>>>>>
>>>>>   libavutil/parseutils.c | 2 ++
>>>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/libavutil/parseutils.c b/libavutil/parseutils.c
>>>>> index be238f0..4cf4471 100644
>>>>> --- a/libavutil/parseutils.c
>>>>> +++ b/libavutil/parseutils.c
>>>>> @@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ static const VideoSizeAbbr video_size_abbrs[] = {
>>>>>       { "hd480",     852, 480 },
>>>>>       { "hd720",    1280, 720 },
>>>>>       { "hd1080",   1920,1080 },
>>>>> +    { "hd2160",   3840,2160 },
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> imho uhd here
>>>
>>>
>>> Not sure how many people know that. I'd add it as aslias.
>>
>> you mean they would not know the ITU name? sounds not likely
>> also given there are two resolutions ending in 2160, the hd2160 is
>> imho more confusing
>>
>
> Ok, so uhd, 4kdci and 4k and 2kdci.

4k alone is as confusing as h2160, imho just drop it
-- 
Vittorio
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to