On 18/07/15 00:00, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 17/07/15 15:18, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> On 17/07/15 01:44, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add DCI 4k and 2160p.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, I'm testing which encoders are able to do something with 4k now =)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   libavutil/parseutils.c | 2 ++
>>>>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/libavutil/parseutils.c b/libavutil/parseutils.c
>>>>>> index be238f0..4cf4471 100644
>>>>>> --- a/libavutil/parseutils.c
>>>>>> +++ b/libavutil/parseutils.c
>>>>>> @@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ static const VideoSizeAbbr video_size_abbrs[] = {
>>>>>>       { "hd480",     852, 480 },
>>>>>>       { "hd720",    1280, 720 },
>>>>>>       { "hd1080",   1920,1080 },
>>>>>> +    { "hd2160",   3840,2160 },
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> imho uhd here
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not sure how many people know that. I'd add it as aslias.
>>>
>>> you mean they would not know the ITU name? sounds not likely
>>> also given there are two resolutions ending in 2160, the hd2160 is
>>> imho more confusing
>>>
>>
>> Ok, so uhd, 4kdci and 4k and 2kdci.
> 
> 4k alone is as confusing as h2160, imho just drop it
> 

Ok.
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to