Quoting Luca Barbato (2015-07-27 17:55:48)
> On 27/07/15 16:24, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > Quoting Luca Barbato (2015-07-25 15:26:27)
> >> ---
> >> libavformat/nut.c | 1 +
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/libavformat/nut.c b/libavformat/nut.c
> >> index 828d9ca..beb27fc 100644
> >> --- a/libavformat/nut.c
> >> +++ b/libavformat/nut.c
> >> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ const AVCodecTag ff_nut_data_tags[] = {
> >>
> >> const AVCodecTag ff_nut_video_tags[] = {
> >> { AV_CODEC_ID_VP9, MKTAG('V', 'P', '9', '0') },
> >> + { AV_CODEC_ID_HEVC, MKTAG('H', 'E', 'V', 'C') },
> >> { AV_CODEC_ID_RAWVIDEO, MKTAG('R', 'G', 'B', 15) },
> >> { AV_CODEC_ID_RAWVIDEO, MKTAG('B', 'G', 'R', 15) },
> >> { AV_CODEC_ID_RAWVIDEO, MKTAG('R', 'G', 'B', 16) },
> >> --
> >> 2.3.2
> >>
> >
> > Is it properly defined what this will do exactly? What
> > bitstream/extradata format is used and such?
> >
>
> As per h264, anything goes.
Then I am against this patch. There should be a clearly defined bistream
format.
--
Anton Khirnov
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
