On 27/07/15 18:05, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Quoting Luca Barbato (2015-07-27 17:55:48)
>> On 27/07/15 16:24, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>>> Quoting Luca Barbato (2015-07-25 15:26:27)
>>>> ---
>>>> libavformat/nut.c | 1 +
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/libavformat/nut.c b/libavformat/nut.c
>>>> index 828d9ca..beb27fc 100644
>>>> --- a/libavformat/nut.c
>>>> +++ b/libavformat/nut.c
>>>> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ const AVCodecTag ff_nut_data_tags[] = {
>>>>
>>>> const AVCodecTag ff_nut_video_tags[] = {
>>>> { AV_CODEC_ID_VP9, MKTAG('V', 'P', '9', '0') },
>>>> + { AV_CODEC_ID_HEVC, MKTAG('H', 'E', 'V', 'C') },
>>>> { AV_CODEC_ID_RAWVIDEO, MKTAG('R', 'G', 'B', 15) },
>>>> { AV_CODEC_ID_RAWVIDEO, MKTAG('B', 'G', 'R', 15) },
>>>> { AV_CODEC_ID_RAWVIDEO, MKTAG('R', 'G', 'B', 16) },
>>>> --
>>>> 2.3.2
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is it properly defined what this will do exactly? What
>>> bitstream/extradata format is used and such?
>>>
>>
>> As per h264, anything goes.
>
> Then I am against this patch. There should be a clearly defined bistream
> format.
>
I'll make the muxer match mkv for h264 and hevc then.
lu
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
