On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > On 30/06/15 11:35, Alexandra Hájková wrote: >> --- >> libavformat/asfdec.c | 12 ++++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/libavformat/asfdec.c b/libavformat/asfdec.c >> index 8f46098..cf0b3a5 100644 >> --- a/libavformat/asfdec.c >> +++ b/libavformat/asfdec.c >> @@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ static int asf_read_data(AVFormatContext *s, const >> GUIDParseTable *g) >> uint64_t size = asf->data_size = avio_rl64(pb); >> int i; >> >> - if (!asf->data_reached && pb->seekable) { >> + if (!asf->data_reached) { >> asf->data_reached = 1; >> asf->data_offset = asf->offset; >> } >> @@ -1660,7 +1660,15 @@ static int asf_read_header(AVFormatContext *s) >> return ret; >> } else { >> size = avio_rl64(pb); >> - align_position(pb, asf->offset, size); >> + if (size < INT64_MAX) >> + align_position(pb, asf->offset, size); >> + else { >> + if (asf->data_reached) { >> + avio_seek(pb, asf->first_packet_offset, SEEK_SET); >> + break; >> + } else >> + return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA; >> + } >> } >> if (asf->data_reached && !pb->seekable) >> break; >> > > Seems quite ok. I'd fix the subject with the missing n in handle and > push later.
What happened to this patch? Is it still needed? -- Vittorio _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
