On 2016-03-26 09:45:59 +0100, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> ---
>  tests/fate/screen.mak     | 13 +++++++++++--
>  tests/ref/fate/rscc       |  6 ------
>  tests/ref/fate/rscc-16bit | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  tests/ref/fate/rscc-24bit |  1 +
>  tests/ref/fate/rscc-32bit |  9 +++++++++
>  5 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/rscc
>  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/rscc-16bit
>  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/rscc-24bit
>  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/rscc-32bit
> 
> diff --git a/tests/fate/screen.mak b/tests/fate/screen.mak
> index 82d4861..502645e 100644
> --- a/tests/fate/screen.mak
> +++ b/tests/fate/screen.mak
> @@ -41,8 +41,17 @@ fate-g2m4: CMD = framecrc -idct simple -i 
> $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/g2m/g2m4.asf
>  FATE_SAMPLES_AVCONV-$(call DEMDEC, ASF, G2M) += $(FATE_G2M)
>  fate-g2m: $(FATE_G2M)
>  
> -FATE_SAMPLES_AVCONV-$(call DEMDEC, AVI, RSCC) += fate-rscc
> -fate-rscc: CMD = framecrc -i $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/rscc/pip.avi -an

is there a reason to replace this tests instead of renaming it simply to 
fate-rscc-32bit? It would help (a little) to keep the fate samples repo 
size down

> +FATE_RSCC += fate-rscc-16bit
> +fate-rscc-16bit: CMD = framecrc -i $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/rscc/16bpp_555.avi -an
> +
> +FATE_RSCC += fate-rscc-24bit
> +fate-rscc-24bit: CMD = framecrc -i $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/rscc/24bpp.avi -an
> +
> +FATE_RSCC += fate-rscc-32bit
> +fate-rscc-32bit: CMD = framecrc -i $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/rscc/32bpp.avi -an
> +
> +FATE_SAMPLES_AVCONV-$(call DEMDEC, AVI, RSCC) += $(FATE_RSCC)
> +fate-rscc: $(FATE_RSCC)
>  
>  FATE_SAMPLES_AVCONV-$(call DEMDEC, AVI, SCREENPRESSO) += fate-screenpresso
>  fate-screenpresso: CMD = framecrc -i $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/spv1/bunny.avi
> diff --git a/tests/ref/fate/rscc b/tests/ref/fate/rscc
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 69dbfe1..0000000
> --- a/tests/ref/fate/rscc
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
> -#tb 0: 1/10
> -0,          0,          0,        1,  6814720, 0x1365f8ef
> -0,          1,          1,        1,  6814720, 0x90838983
> -0,          2,          2,        1,  6814720, 0xf0cc3131
> -0,          3,          3,        1,  6814720, 0xc07e404d
> -0,          4,          4,        1,  6814720, 0x945962dd
> diff --git a/tests/ref/fate/rscc-16bit b/tests/ref/fate/rscc-16bit
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..85d5494
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/ref/fate/rscc-16bit
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +#tb 0: 100/2397
> +0,          0,          0,        1,   153600, 0x33759daf
> +0,          1,          1,        1,   153600, 0x43e0c910
> +0,          2,          2,        1,   153600, 0x6c75a8f0
> +0,          3,          3,        1,   153600, 0xaace1255
> +0,          4,          4,        1,   153600, 0x42d3f439
> +0,          5,          5,        1,   153600, 0xb225b396
> +0,          6,          6,        1,   153600, 0xa615221c
> +0,          7,          7,        1,   153600, 0x5401f5a9
> +0,          8,          8,        1,   153600, 0xd274cef3
> +0,          9,          9,        1,   153600, 0x7935f992
> +0,         10,         10,        1,   153600, 0x7669e7c6
> +0,         11,         11,        1,   153600, 0x527bd6a1
> +0,         12,         12,        1,   153600, 0x0f33b2ed
> +0,         13,         13,        1,   153600, 0xe62ddb32
> +0,         14,         14,        1,   153600, 0x81541aa2
> diff --git a/tests/ref/fate/rscc-24bit b/tests/ref/fate/rscc-24bit
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f5b215d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/ref/fate/rscc-24bit
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +#tb 0: 1/10

the fate-rscc-24bit test doesn't produce any frames, either the sample 
is not suiteable or there is bug in the code

Janne
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to