On 2016-05-05 21:47:54 +0900, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 05/05/16 21:22, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > Actually I think it would make more sense to have the 63-bit version as > > the unprefixed "default" one, since most bitstream reading is parsing > > frame headers and such where performance is not all that important, but > > safety is. > > > > Get the alternate name for bitstream_read 0-32.
I agree that the 63-bit versions are the saner defaults but I don't have good names for the at most 32 bits alternatives. Maybe we could use 'narrow' or 'half' as specifiers. Janne _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
