On 05/05/16 22:09, Janne Grunau wrote: > On 2016-05-05 21:47:54 +0900, Luca Barbato wrote: >> On 05/05/16 21:22, Anton Khirnov wrote: >>> Actually I think it would make more sense to have the 63-bit version as >>> the unprefixed "default" one, since most bitstream reading is parsing >>> frame headers and such where performance is not all that important, but >>> safety is. >>> >> >> Get the alternate name for bitstream_read 0-32. > > I agree that the 63-bit versions are the saner defaults but I don't have > good names for the at most 32 bits alternatives. Maybe we could use > 'narrow' or 'half' as specifiers. >
narrow sounds quite descriptive. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
