On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 01:12:47PM +0100, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 10:51:15AM +0100, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > --- a/configure > >> > +++ b/configure > >> > @@ -4165,9 +4165,7 @@ EOF > >> > > >> > -check_cc <<EOF && enable_weak inline_asm > >> > -void foo(void) { __asm__ volatile ("" ::); } > >> > -EOF > >> > +check_inline_asm inline_asm '"" ::' > >> > >> Is the change just a more succinct check or is there a particular reason > >> for it? > > > > The former: > > > > check_inline_asm(){ > > log check_inline_asm "$@" > > name="$1" > > code="$2" > > shift 2 > > disable $name > > check_cc "$@" <<EOF && enable $name > > void foo(void){ __asm__ volatile($code); } > > EOF > > } > > ok thanks for the clarification, maybe you could mention that this > change is only a simplification and not a behavioral change.
Like this: configure: Simplify inline asm check with appropriate helper function ? Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
