On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 01:12:47PM +0100, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 10:51:15AM +0100, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > --- a/configure
>> >> > +++ b/configure
>> >> > @@ -4165,9 +4165,7 @@ EOF
>> >> >
>> >> > -check_cc <<EOF && enable_weak inline_asm
>> >> > -void foo(void) { __asm__ volatile ("" ::); }
>> >> > -EOF
>> >> > +check_inline_asm inline_asm '"" ::'
>> >>
>> >> Is the change just a more succinct check or is there a particular reason 
>> >> for it?
>> >
>> > The former:
>> >
>> > check_inline_asm(){
>> >     log check_inline_asm "$@"
>> >     name="$1"
>> >     code="$2"
>> >     shift 2
>> >     disable $name
>> >     check_cc "$@" <<EOF && enable $name
>> > void foo(void){ __asm__ volatile($code); }
>> > EOF
>> > }
>>
>> ok thanks for the clarification, maybe you could mention that this
>> change is only a simplification and not a behavioral change.
>
> Like this:
>
>   configure: Simplify inline asm check with appropriate helper function
>
> ?
>
> Diego
> _______________________________________________

sure
-- 
Vittorio
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to