On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:57:21PM +0200, Martin Storsjö wrote: > On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > >None of them are specific to the YASM assembler. > >--- > > > >Same as before, better names for the following are welcome: > > > >- --disable-yasm disable use of nasm/yasm assembly > >+ --disable-assembler disable use of standalone assembly > > > >Plain "nasm" would be possible, the syntax is nasm after all. > >Or "x86-asm" or whatever better name you suggest, I don't like > >any of my ideas much .. > > Hmm, out of these, I'd maybe rank them like this: > 1) x86-asm > 2) nasm > 3) yasm > > I kinda dislike --disable-assembler since it doesn't sound different to > --disable-asm (which disables all of it).
I guess I shall go with x86-asm then. > The patch looks mostly ok. I don't mind using "ASM" instead of "YASM" in > makefiles etc, since that's mostly an internal detail. OTOH, maybe it would > be ok to keep using YASM or NASM there as well. (I don't see a huge value in > changing those parts tbh.) You know I'm a stickler for consistency ;) Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
