> On Jan 25, 2015, at 7:04 AM, Don Moir <[email protected]> wrote: > > I front end ffmpeg with my own API. This API does time accurate seeking and a > lot of work to do. The API does more than wrap ffmpeg though. It attempts to > address problems with ffmpeg and also deals with display output, audio > analysis, audio devices, device enumeration, special effects, scaling and > more. You might say well ffmpeg can do this, but not really in the way I need > it. > > For me it had to be that it all worked in the best possible way correcting > any potential problem and had to be available to others that had no notion of > ffmpeg. > > Personally I am happy to do my own API for this and can easily customize it > to meet current or future needs. ffmpeg just serves as the low level decoder > for audio and video and that is fine with me and ffmpeg is only part of the > internal libraries and capabilites.
Don — Thanks for your response…you’ve stated well great reasons for a higher-level abstraction, which is exactly along the lines of what I was thinking. All — thanks to everyone who replied, regardless of the expressed sentiment or position on the matter. All feedback was helpful, and helped me reach a conclusion of where and for whom my efforts and ideas would be best contributed. Cheers, Brad _______________________________________________ Libav-user mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
