Pete Batard wrote:
> 'pragmatic-multiextent-2020' branch that I am kindly asking to review

I had to dig out my final statements from summer 2018.

Yes. I'm fully in support of old pragmatic-multiextent and thus of its
tested adoption in pragmatic-multiextent-2020.
>From all proposals for multi-extent it is the least risky one and
imposes the least burden on old applications.

Now i should look for the tests which i did with pragmatic-multiextent
(in part while it was much like pbatard-multiextent2).
Hopefully i can give some report until sunday evening.

Have a nice day :)


Reply via email to