Hi, Pete Batard wrote: > 'pragmatic-multiextent-2020' branch that I am kindly asking to review
I had to dig out my final statements from summer 2018. Yes. I'm fully in support of old pragmatic-multiextent and thus of its tested adoption in pragmatic-multiextent-2020. >From all proposals for multi-extent it is the least risky one and imposes the least burden on old applications. Now i should look for the tests which i did with pragmatic-multiextent (in part while it was much like pbatard-multiextent2). Hopefully i can give some report until sunday evening. Have a nice day :) Thomas
