On 2020.05.23 14:41, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
diff --git a/lib/iso9660/iso9660_fs.c b/lib/iso9660/iso9660_fs.c
index ed2d158..48e098f 100644
--- a/lib/iso9660/iso9660_fs.c
+++ b/lib/iso9660/iso9660_fs.c
@@ -844,7 +844,9 @@ _iso9660_dir_to_statbuf (iso9660_dir_t *p_iso9660_dir,
{
/* Check if this is the last part of a multiextent file */
if (!first_extent) {
- if (strcmp(p_stat->filename, &p_iso9660_dir->filename.str[1]) != 0) {
+ if (strlen(p_stat->filename) != i_fname ||
+ strncmp(p_stat->filename, &p_iso9660_dir->filename.str[1], i_fname)
+ != 0) {
cdio_warn("Non consecutive multiextent file parts for '%s'",
p_stat->filename);
goto fail;
=========================================================================
Good call!
I never saw that one with the ISOs I tested, but then again, I haven't
tested an ISO with non-consecutive extents.
I have applied your patch, and also applied a second one that fixes the
use of staging macros I failed to revert (At one stage, I was using
LIBCDIO_API_2020 instead of DO_NOT_WANT_COMPATIBILITY, and I overlooked
changing some of these back).
If you pull the branch, you should have these 2 patches now.
Regards,
/Pete
