> Dhaval, > > Thanks, I cloned the code and looked at it. Couple of quick questions > > 1. Why do we call the old code deprecated? We leave it to the users to > use which version they want and provide extensive documentation around > thread fork()/exec() issues with the older API
Because I don't think anyone of us will be maintaining that code :-). > 2. Have you thought about how we can keep cgroup_context_s extendable > without breaking too much. Ideally it is opaque so we have no problems > in terms of API, but ABI can be an issue. One way to force it would > be to pack the structure, so that there is no scope for padding and > getting offsets mixed up later. > Honestly, I have not given it much thought as of now. I will get back to you in a day or two and let you know how to minimize ABI breakage. Thanks, Dhaval ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Libcg-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libcg-devel
