On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Vivek Goyal <vgo...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:26:12AM -0700, Dhaval Giani wrote: >> > Ok. But we still have that problem of conflict between systemd and >> > cgconfig cgroups. >> > >> > What if a user wants following hiearchy. >> > >> > root >> > / \ >> > xyz systemd >> > >> > systemd will create its groups in top hierachy and cgconfig does not have >> > any way to control them. >> > >> >> why should cgconfig care about it? > > Are you saying that cgconfig does not control whole of the cgroup > hierarchy. It controls only part of it. In the sense that there might be > other cgroups present in the system which are not known the cgconfig. >
yes, that was always the original goal > It is a relatively lose model. If that's the goal, then things are > fine. But I don't think that's the goal you had started with. Actually the original plan was this itself. The persistent stuff is stored by cgconfig, and the non persistent stuff can be created on the fly. We can always treat systemd as non-persistent and not bother about it. Dhaval ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2 _______________________________________________ Libcg-devel mailing list Libcg-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libcg-devel
