Hi. On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 09:51:25AM -0800, Dhaval Giani <dhaval.gi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Not really. The ignore rules make sense when you have cgroups that are > controlled by a third party entity and you do not want to modify the > participants of that cgroup. What I meant was that ignore rules make sense only when they "cut out" a subset of an existing rule. (My first thought was why are ignore rules needed, when the rule line can simply be dropped [1].)
I see ignore rules are justified by the untouchable cgroup, however, shouldn't it be respected across all utils (mostly cgclear)? Michal [1] When I was pondering the "cohabitation" myself, I thought of whitelisting instead of blacklisting subtrees. _______________________________________________ Libcg-devel mailing list Libcg-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libcg-devel
