On 12/2/19 8:29 AM, Michal Koutný wrote:
Hi.
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 09:51:25AM -0800, Dhaval Giani <dhaval.gi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Not really. The ignore rules make sense when you have cgroups that are
controlled by a third party entity and you do not want to modify the
participants of that cgroup.
What I meant was that ignore rules make sense only when they "cut out" a
subset of an existing rule. (My first thought was why are ignore rules
needed, when the rule line can simply be dropped [1].)
I see ignore rules are justified by the untouchable cgroup, however,
shouldn't it be respected across all utils (mostly cgclear)?
Yes, I plan on adding support to all utilities soon.
Thanks.
Tom
Michal
[1] When I was pondering the "cohabitation" myself, I thought of
whitelisting instead of blacklisting subtrees.
_______________________________________________
Libcg-devel mailing list
Libcg-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libcg-devel
