On Jul 19, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Jed Smith wrote: > On Jul 19, 2010, at 10:13 AM, [email protected] wrote: > >> >> On Jul 19, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Jed Smith wrote: >> >>> On Jul 18, 2010, at 12:25 AM, Tom Davis wrote: >>> >>>> Judging by the exception, I guess they stopped implicitly casting >>>> variables used in format strings? That's not something I remember reading >>>> about in What's New, but it makes sense in that context. What header we're >>>> sending that isn't a string is another question. >>> >>> That's eye-opening. >>> >>> I always thought %s called str() on the arguments in question if they >>> weren't >>> strings already. If they did indeed change that, half of my code (not only >>> in libcloud) is going to break. I'd hope that's a regression and not >>> intentional... >> >> Please see my previous message about the redundant header that's being >> explicitly set as an integer. > > Oh, it's in the .join(values). That makes more sense, and has never worked. > > My apologies, read the exception wrong.
No problem, now, the question is who is going to remove the setting of the redundant header and get it committed? S
