On Jul 19, 2010, at 10:35 AM, [email protected] wrote:

> 
> On Jul 19, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Jed Smith wrote:
> 
>> On Jul 19, 2010, at 10:13 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jul 19, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Jed Smith wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Jul 18, 2010, at 12:25 AM, Tom Davis wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Judging by the exception, I guess they stopped implicitly casting 
>>>>> variables used in format strings? That's not something I remember reading 
>>>>> about in What's New, but it makes sense in that context. What header 
>>>>> we're sending that isn't a string is another question.
>>>> 
>>>> That's eye-opening.
>>>> 
>>>> I always thought %s called str() on the arguments in question if they 
>>>> weren't
>>>> strings already.  If they did indeed change that, half of my code (not only
>>>> in libcloud) is going to break.  I'd hope that's a regression and not
>>>> intentional...
>>> 
>>> Please see my previous message about the redundant header that's being 
>>> explicitly set as an integer.
>> 
>> Oh, it's in the .join(values).  That makes more sense, and has never worked.
>> 
>> My apologies, read the exception wrong.
> 
> No problem, now, the question is who is going to remove the setting of the 
> redundant header and get it committed?

I cast it to string as opposed to removing it.  There may be a reason it is set
that both of us are unaware of.  LIBCLOUD-43 created for tracking.

Fixed in r965538 = 04f1f94f1fe26d2ac36f29d7b7a57ea786fed070

JS

Reply via email to